In democratic nations governed through the rule of law, such as Indonesia, felony procedure legislation serves as a significant Software for upholding justice and safeguarding human rights. even so, its software in banking corruption scenarios managed via the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) commonly encounters important obstacles, specially in guaranteeing the protection of suspects' legal rights amid the commission's considerable powers and risks of deviating from thanks course of action concepts.
Introduction to felony process in Corruption Enforcement
Indonesia's lawful framework emphasizes legal process law as being a cornerstone for fair justice, but actual-planet implementation reveals gaps, specifically in substantial-stakes banking corruption investigations led via the KPK. These circumstances normally entail intricate economic strategies, wherever the KPK's broad investigative authority can occasionally overshadow procedural safeguards, bringing about worries in excess of suspects' legal rights violations. this informative article explores how criminal course of action regulation features in this kind of contexts, drawing from a normative Investigation to spotlight both equally its strengths and shortcomings.
Research Objectives and Methodology
The primary objective of this assessment is usually to evaluate how the KPK applies prison course of action law in banking corruption conditions and To judge its success in preserving suspects' basic legal rights through the approach. By focusing on normative legal analysis, this analyze employs legislative, conceptual, and case-primarily based techniques. information is analyzed qualitatively to compare Banking Corruption Cases recognized lawful norms with actual enforcement tactics from the KPK in banking-associated issues, when also measuring the diploma of legal rights defense afforded to suspects.
This methodical framework allows for a radical critique of Indonesia's felony treatment Code (KUHAP) and its alignment with KPK functions, revealing insights into procedural compliance and places needing reform.
essential results on efficiency and issues
The Assessment implies that the KPK's utilization of prison procedure law has tested helpful in combating corruption throughout the banking sector, contributing to prosperous prosecutions and deterrence. Regardless of this, persistent issues undermine suspects' rights safety, particularly for the duration of investigations, detentions, and media interactions. For instance, the complexity of banking situations can result in procedural oversights, where by the urgency to dismantle corrupt networks from time to time bypasses stringent adherence to thanks approach.
Normatively, Indonesia's felony technique law delivers robust guarantees for suspects' basic rights, together with honest demo protections and limits on arbitrary detention. In apply, on the other hand, implementation falters as a result of worries like inadequate oversight and the KPK's dominant purpose, which can bring about deviations from KUHAP criteria. These discrepancies emphasize the tension involving intense anti-corruption efforts and the necessity for equitable lawful proceedings.
Recommendations for advancement
To address these gaps, it is vital to foster far better alignment involving the KPK's mandates and KUHAP tips, together with Improved regulatory steps and bigger professionalism among legislation enforcement staff. these methods would boost a more balanced procedure, making sure that anti-corruption initiatives never compromise suspects' legal rights and upholding the principles of a good judicial approach.
resource:
AI with Paraphrase post
Citations:
Hermawan, Eric, Moh Taufik, and Sri Astutik. "The part of prison course of action legislation in Banking Corruption instances dealt with with the KPK: making sure the Protection of Suspect Rights." Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum 24.2 (2025): 3012-3023.